Post by account_disabled on Mar 7, 2024 0:33:58 GMT -5
While the dialogue table between the Government of the Nation and the Government of the Generalitat began to function, the people of Puigdemont's party were left out of that political space for dialogue. Quite a symbol. And meanwhile, Puigdemont, pending a judicial ruling from the European justice system for an appeal regarding his immunity, wandered erratically outside the Spanish and European political playing field. The mechanism was simple: the European Parliament had withdrawn his immunity, but an appeal by the defense of the affected person managed to postpone any judicial initiative against him outside of Spain. Fact that meant that the famous European arrest warrant to demand his extradition was, by pure logic, actually suspended and subject to the final ruling of the European court.
Many of us thought that Judge Llarena had postponed said European order until it could have efficient effects against an already defenseless Puigdemont, in the event that the European justice system rejected the appeal and left him completely uncontested without immunity. In this situation, the political weight of the escaped former president was reducing in a way that was directly Australia Phone Number proportional to the oblivion generated by the passage of time, and to the irrelevance that he himself fed with his stimulus visits to marginal separatists on the European spectrum, such as some of the Sardinians whom he was going to visit on this glorified journey. There has been a lot of speculation about the causes of his surprising arrest, and about the strangeness of the action of the Sardinian police who suddenly realize that there is an arrest warrant, which many other police officers have ignored for whatever reasons. We mentioned at the beginning. But whatever the reason for this police action, what is truly striking is that a judge of the Spanish Supreme Court, with Llarena's experience, and even with a resume in which some highlight prudence, would not have first suspended the European order - he who had even consulted the European justice system - and second, instead of a quick and well-measured reflection calculating the path that the Sardinian police action could take - in view of the.
Existing judicial context - he launched to immediately provide the famous euro warrant, in the hope that an Italian judge would hand over the escapee. Wouldn't it have been more thoughtful to analyze what so many legal experts were already doing publicly, to realize that no European judge was going to tread the territory currently occupied by the justice of the Union, resolving against all logic decisions that the European justice itself would have discredited? It is true that judges are invested with the so-called jurisdictional power, which gives them autonomy and power to judge, but which is far from the infallibility that Catholics attribute to the Pope (by the way, with increasingly less conviction). But in the face of such a delicate case, given the lessons previously suffered, couldn't Judge Llarena himself have consulted his actions with the leadership of the Supreme Court itself, at least to form a more considered judgment? Or did he do it? Because if so, the case becomes worse, since it is assumed that the guidance received reinforced his actions which, seen from the outside, seem reckless at the very least. No matter how blind they want to paint Justice, it cannot act without context.
Many of us thought that Judge Llarena had postponed said European order until it could have efficient effects against an already defenseless Puigdemont, in the event that the European justice system rejected the appeal and left him completely uncontested without immunity. In this situation, the political weight of the escaped former president was reducing in a way that was directly Australia Phone Number proportional to the oblivion generated by the passage of time, and to the irrelevance that he himself fed with his stimulus visits to marginal separatists on the European spectrum, such as some of the Sardinians whom he was going to visit on this glorified journey. There has been a lot of speculation about the causes of his surprising arrest, and about the strangeness of the action of the Sardinian police who suddenly realize that there is an arrest warrant, which many other police officers have ignored for whatever reasons. We mentioned at the beginning. But whatever the reason for this police action, what is truly striking is that a judge of the Spanish Supreme Court, with Llarena's experience, and even with a resume in which some highlight prudence, would not have first suspended the European order - he who had even consulted the European justice system - and second, instead of a quick and well-measured reflection calculating the path that the Sardinian police action could take - in view of the.
Existing judicial context - he launched to immediately provide the famous euro warrant, in the hope that an Italian judge would hand over the escapee. Wouldn't it have been more thoughtful to analyze what so many legal experts were already doing publicly, to realize that no European judge was going to tread the territory currently occupied by the justice of the Union, resolving against all logic decisions that the European justice itself would have discredited? It is true that judges are invested with the so-called jurisdictional power, which gives them autonomy and power to judge, but which is far from the infallibility that Catholics attribute to the Pope (by the way, with increasingly less conviction). But in the face of such a delicate case, given the lessons previously suffered, couldn't Judge Llarena himself have consulted his actions with the leadership of the Supreme Court itself, at least to form a more considered judgment? Or did he do it? Because if so, the case becomes worse, since it is assumed that the guidance received reinforced his actions which, seen from the outside, seem reckless at the very least. No matter how blind they want to paint Justice, it cannot act without context.